Liberals and their Love of Law Enforcement

Growing up I’d always thought of being Liberal as a virtue. During the last Bush administration, it was liberals who were anti-war, who marched for peace, who demanded action on global warming, who were the backbone of the struggling labor movement.

With Obama in the white house, being liberal now means making excuses for war, remaining totally silent regarding Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, ignoring Obama’s KXL tar sand pipeline, ignoring Chelsea Manning’s heroism and her decades long prison sentence, shrugging at mention of Edward Snowden’s world-changing sacrifice. Explain to today’s liberal how Obama’s militarization of the border has deported over 2 million migrant workers and refugees fleeing drug cartel violence, and they’ll stare at you blankly.

What concern liberals still have for climate change usually gets channeled into signing online petitions from MoveOn or 350. Rarely do they display solidarity with the people taking direction action against KXL or other devastating extraction operations. Liberals tell us to remain nonviolent during protests, regardless of the violence committed by police, and regardless of the institutional violence committed every day against marginalized communities. The liberal of today is concerned with better bicycle lanes, but not rising rents that soon follow. And why should they? Life’s pretty good with Democrats running the show, as long as you’re a Democrat.

This cognitive dissonance is no different than that of their alleged enemies in the Republican party or the Tea Party (they’re still out there, trust me). Strangely, these conservative libertarians seem far more willing to stand up to bullying law enforcement than today’s liberals. Perhaps this has something to do with the Right’s firearm fetish, while liberals relentlessly remind us we mustn’t defend ourselves from attacks by police.

Today’s liberal has embraced the state and the market as virtuous. They’ve rationalized there’s only one viable political party. They’ve resigned that solving poverty may have to wait while austerity budgeting becomes the norm. When they do celebrate a drop in crime and an increase in a community’s financial wealth, it’s usually only after crime and the poor were exported somewhere else via gentrification, which they’ve absurdly now argued has a ‘good’ side.

Yes, all is fine and good in the land of Liberalism today. While they must be ever vigilant against the regressive threat of Republicans stripping reproductive freedoms, or of wars started by Republicans, liberals are enjoying Obama’s second term, and likely a coming future 8 years of Hillary Clinton as president. The state is on their side. Law enforcement is here to keep them safe. Or are they?

It’s always disturbed me how blind some people can be to police violence, as though it’s some vague, rare occurrence committed by a few bad apples, that most cops are good people with the best intentions of protecting and serving. Unfortunately for most, until they personally witness the callous attitudes and savagery ubiquitous within police departments, they’ll effortlessly go on ignoring institutionalized brutality. They seemingly forget the full proverb reads: A few bad apples spoils the entire bunch.

Remember that cop who got famous for giving shoes to a homeless person? He shot and killed an injured man in handcuffs a year later.





It’s worth remembering the very creation of policing in America was not to protect and serve. It was to corral the ‘property’ of slave-owners. Police hunted down liberated slaves, beat them, punished them, and returned them to their ‘masters’. Targeting entire communities based on their race has hardly changed as an operating principle within law enforcement 3oo years later.

The world of active transit and bicycle/pedestrian advocacy can seem a homogenous world indeed, populated by liberal-identifying, university educated, middle-class whites in buttoned shirts. The range of acceptable terms and behaviors practiced within this circle is narrow. Politeness is expected at all times, passive aggression occasionally tolerated. Never is emotional confrontation or radical introspection of an institution allowed. Never is class struggle discussed. You achieve access to this clique through obedience, and you had better praise the police, as they are part of the government with whom you work to compel.

Every once in a while, though, a sliver of truth pierces this bubble. Recently, a precinct captain in New York City used the news of a woman’s traffic death after falling onto subway tracks to mock transit safety advocates, as well as a few of their more radical counterparts. In his own words, Captain Thomas Harnisch: “Let me guess, driver’s fault, right?

The NYPD captain quickly deleted this Tweet, along with several embarrassing others, after a barrage of establishment criticism. However, before getting his ass handed to him, the ignorant captain doubled-down on snark, “Isn’t that exactly what you do? Seize on a tragedy and assign culpability having no facts, to further your agenda?

Despite my above criticisms of liberal transpo advocates, their intention of making streets safer is noble, as the inherent harm automobiles pose is only just becoming understood as an issue of class and social justice. To label this an ‘agenda’ is actually honest, but for Captain Harnisch to imply that safer streets are not an agenda of the NYPD would be shocking if it wasn’t so historically accurate. I’m sure most livable street advocates remember this winter’s #VisionZero fail when New York cops beat and bloodied an 84 year old man who didn’t speak english for the ‘crime’ of crossing the street.

Now, I’m not arguing liberal silence is the reason cops are racist, patriarchal assholes who literally get away with murder. But as evidenced with this Captain Harnisch gaffe, we see how fast police will drop the attitude and start acting like human beings, albeit briefly for PR reasons, when intelligent people start speaking out. Negative social reinforcement can work wonders, especially on bullies.

There are dire urban and global socio/enviro issues that liberals and others on the Left have been quiet on for too many years of Obama’s terms in office, including routine brutality committed by the very police they often praise. If they want to reclaim their progressive laurels, they’ll have to risk their access to power and start speaking some real talk.

Ultimately, labels of identity politics do us a disservice. It’s enlightening to break down barriers, to start talking with people you’d been told were your enemy – those still capable of honest communication not corrupted by institutional obligation. We find more common cause than previously imagined. For people-powered politics to evolve, liberals and those of other political strata need to get just a bit more pissed off at the status quo .

See you in the streets.


– YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Portland bike cops gone wild, attacking and beating peaceful dance-party on May Day 2012 for marching without a permit, aka: jaywalking.



  1. being liberal is a virtue – look up the definition. no idea what americans think ‘liberal’ means, or whatever political bullshit is hijacking such terms, but some of us actually still know the definition.

    1. You said exactly what I was thinking. It is difficult to be an effective liberal in this age of corporatism, since we are all pretty much slaves of it. I do agree it helps to break down these borders whenever possible. And I call out Obama on all the unkept promises – like every president in my lifetime, whatever the party, he is in the pockets of the Corporazi.

  2. But perhaps you believe in Anarchy? most that do like the signs more than the realities of that, i’m sure! FTP. ride a bike. i thought all the americans justified having guns so they would have equal power in relation to the authorities anyway? that doesn’t seem to be much help in dealing with the NYPD now does it?

    1. I do not ‘believe’ in Anarchy. However, I do think that the self-governance and community policing inherent in Anarchy is a far better form of Democracy than any nation state has ever explored.

  3. You might be interested in this:

    Hey Jammers,

    We’re now entering the endgame of our six-part series Blueprint for a New World. So far we’ve traversed the mindscapes of Psycho, Eco, Corpo, Techno and now we’re off to the races with Politico … which is shaping up to be our most neuron bending geopolitical fissure yet.

    In the aftermath of the Arab Spring, Indignados, Occupy Wall Street and the global uprisings that followed, there was great hope. But now a growing mood of despair has taken hold; it is a feeling marked by the rise of General el-Sisi in Egypt, the disintegration of Syria, the march of ISIS, the uncertainty in Ukraine, the massacres in Gaza and more. We wake up each morning to see a broken and militant psychic terrain. Another civilizational narrative is likely underway, but its tones, its essence, its aesthetic, no one has yet pinned down.

    We’re looking for politically-minded reader submissions with guts and fervor, to lend a voice to the most viscerally and politically charged currents of our time. How do you feel about politics these days? What can you do about it? Are we at the start of a third world war? Is a new transparent, bottom-up internet-based world struggling to be born? Have we finally reached a climax of psychological, social, ecological and financial tipping points? What are the tactical breakthroughs we need to make?

    If you’ve got a blast, rant, confession, manifesto, beef, grievance, epiphany, dream, vision, visceral update from the frontlines or a new way of being to shout to the politico world … send it to by Aug 4, 2014, and you could be featured in the next issue of Adbusters, while helping to nudge the world toward a much needed reckoning …

Comments are closed.