Sooo, this happened yesterday. The great progressive state of Oregon’s Department of Transportation tweeted out its expert opinion that dangerous driving is a behavior problem that cannot be attributed to road design. How any person working for a DOT, let alone the person tasked with representing the department via social media could be so ignorant is truly alarming.
Unfortunately, ODOT has proven a track record of reinforcing ignorant attitudes with ignorant agendas. From pushing freeway expansions to butchering bicycle infrastructure to using woefully antiquated design guidelines to failing to act while the death toll rises on state managed roads, ODOT’s banality of transportation evil is well known. This, however, is beyond the pale. I won’t detail why this level of incompetence is unacceptable. If you’re reading a blog about livable streets and tactical urbanism, you get it. And you know there is no excuse for this.
@go_by_bike Not sure how a road encourages distracted driving, speeding or agressive driving.
— Oregon DOT (@oregondot) November 26, 2013
— Scott Hillson (@OfficerHillson) November 26, 2013
The responses received were understandably a mix of frustration, shock, and I-can’t-believe-we-have-to-explain-this-shit-to-you attempts at teaching the agency what every responsible planner already knows. Driving habits are the product of the built road environment. If you want safer streets, you need narrower lanes, and less of them.
When the bureaucrats refuse to enact sensible laws to make streets safer, it’s up to regular citizens to step up their game. More and more, the only way the job is getting done is through direct action. Such is the case with the New York City group Right of Way, who’ve been grabbing headlines by breaking the law to ensure the streets of NYC are a little less lethal.
Right of Way first made it’s name known painting guerrilla sharrows and ‘vigilante’ bike lanes throughout Midtown this summer. Said organizer Keegan Stephan, “It’s been proven time and time again that if you install a bike lane, it lowers the number of crashes. We’re doing something for the public good. So I think it’s OK, even if it’s illegal.“
Then this past weekend, the group defied the city’s potential plan to only reduce speeds on select streets to 25pmh by erecting their own 20mph signs on a number of blocks. 20mph is considered to be the fastest speed a motor vehicle can safely travel, as collisions with people have less than a 5% chance of causing death at this speed.
Sadly, predictably, a NYDOT spokesperson confirmed the signs had already been removed by city employees on Monday. Can’t have the people making the local DOT look bad! The silver lining? Should Right of Way choose to erect more of them, a sympathetic sign-making company has promised they’ll print them up, free of change. How’s that for solidarity?
Courtesy Liz Patek
If this is the kind of action that it takes to get the job done, so be it. If our local and state transportation agencies are content to squander funding on studies to prove what we already know instead of spending money that could otherwise go towards building safer infrastructure, then it’s time to bust out the stencils and paint rollers ourselves.
ODOT’s dismissive attitude about its responsibility to ensure road safety for all users is deplorable and deserves to be shamed. Ultimately, though, we’re the one’s who live along these streets. We owe it to ourselves to shape them how they need to be to ensure our own safety and ability to enjoy fulfilling lives. Whose streets? Our streets!
A resident has a conversation with a project engineer about the proposed improvements to her street. We’ve heard of, seen or taken part in thousands of conversations just like this all across the country.
Ghost bike of Brett Jarolimek pictured at top copyright Hart Noecker.